If what we think we see and experts of realism claim to know is not completely real, then how can we know what is? (from Part VI)
When the unified theory of realism is questioned, are answers given? If black holes actually exist, what is on the other side? If negative energy actually exists, what is it? What is on the other side from which it ‘pops’ into the void? If there are multi-universes or parallel universes, what is their origin? How did any thing come into being that has come into being? What is the origin of life?
The priest and prophets of realism cannot tell us. They cannot give real answers to origins because layers of transformation and history veil its singular uniqueness. They may guess, but the unified theory of realism is incapable of anything beyond quantum surface knowledge. With all of their great accomplishments, astrophysicists cannot tell us what happened a few microseconds before the big bang, and neither can the historians of nature. The history of living organisms is hardly knowable much before the Cambrian explosion. If honesty is of any value, then how will moderns ever get answers to such questions? Maybe more important is getting answers to more basic questions like why does it exist at all? What is each person’s purpose? Why moral accountability? Why right and wrong? What is its source? Any answers from realism cannot be trusted because they are based on the deception of natural realism. Therefore, moderns are forced to turn to the ancients, or to those who have continued to consult and learn from them.
See also Part VI,
No comments:
Post a Comment